
All my life I've lived under the "It's just a cat" philosophy of pet ownership. Basically, I believe that while we respect our pets and treat them kindly, they're not people. They don't eat at the table, wear clothes, or get Christmas presents. And they certainly don't receive the same health care that, say, a child should. I've laughed at people who take their doggies in for psychological counseling, and shaken my head in disbelief over people who spend thousands of dollars for chemotherapy, major surgery, or other treatments for terminal illnesses. "It's just a pet," I'd say.
But I'm finding that philosophy challenged as I'm forced to put an actual price on the care of my own cat. Over a month ago, Daisy, our cat, was attacked by either a large stray or a raccoon. She favored her left front paw and we could see a couple of small cuts on it. We tried to keep her paw clean and, since we had some antibiotics left over from a previous visit to the vet, we gave them to her. After a month of her not getting better, we finally decided that we needed to take her to the vet when she started bleeding. Two visits and about $400 later, we discovered that the lacerations on her paw were the least of her injuries. She had a deep cut about an inch long on her left front foreleg and several nasty puncture wounds on her left shoulder. The vet cleaned and opened the wounds to allow them to drain, and told us how to keep them clean.
A week later we took her back to the vet for another round of antibiotics and painkillers and another inspection. And another $200. This time, they discovered another small injury to her right hind leg. The vet took blood and tested for kitty HIV and Leukemia. Two conditions for which, I'd still like to THINK, I would opt to put Daisy down rather than have her treated. At that visit, the vet scheduled a follow-up for Friday. Thursday night, as we cleaned her wounds, one of the holes in her left shoulder started bleeding. Prodigious bleeding. Thick, goopy, Jell-O like bleeding. We didn't clean her the next morning, so the vet could see what had happened. He stapled and stitched and put in a shunt to help the shoulder wounds drain. And sold us a stronger antibiotic and pain killers. Cost: $327.
Since then, Daisy has twice torn the staples by jumping up on beds, chairs, or countertops. The first time, it cost us $190 (this not six hours after we'd paid $75 for more antibiotics. Turns that our neighbors, whose cat was also mauled by the same animal, is also having trouble throwing off the infection), and the second time the vet took pity on us and didn't charge us. Not even for the anesthesia.
So, all told, we've spent over $1,000 on our just-a-cat, and she's nowhere near recovered. At one point my wife mentioned, "in theory, I guess I could just not go pick her up. But that seems wrong." And I agree. I still don't value Daisy's life as highly as I would a person's – but I can't see myself NOT paying for her treatment, either. And I wonder if there will come a point when I CAN say, "That's it, we just can't afford to deal with this any more," or whether, like all the pet fanatics I used to mock, I'm committed for the long haul.
But I'm finding that philosophy challenged as I'm forced to put an actual price on the care of my own cat. Over a month ago, Daisy, our cat, was attacked by either a large stray or a raccoon. She favored her left front paw and we could see a couple of small cuts on it. We tried to keep her paw clean and, since we had some antibiotics left over from a previous visit to the vet, we gave them to her. After a month of her not getting better, we finally decided that we needed to take her to the vet when she started bleeding. Two visits and about $400 later, we discovered that the lacerations on her paw were the least of her injuries. She had a deep cut about an inch long on her left front foreleg and several nasty puncture wounds on her left shoulder. The vet cleaned and opened the wounds to allow them to drain, and told us how to keep them clean.
A week later we took her back to the vet for another round of antibiotics and painkillers and another inspection. And another $200. This time, they discovered another small injury to her right hind leg. The vet took blood and tested for kitty HIV and Leukemia. Two conditions for which, I'd still like to THINK, I would opt to put Daisy down rather than have her treated. At that visit, the vet scheduled a follow-up for Friday. Thursday night, as we cleaned her wounds, one of the holes in her left shoulder started bleeding. Prodigious bleeding. Thick, goopy, Jell-O like bleeding. We didn't clean her the next morning, so the vet could see what had happened. He stapled and stitched and put in a shunt to help the shoulder wounds drain. And sold us a stronger antibiotic and pain killers. Cost: $327.
Since then, Daisy has twice torn the staples by jumping up on beds, chairs, or countertops. The first time, it cost us $190 (this not six hours after we'd paid $75 for more antibiotics. Turns that our neighbors, whose cat was also mauled by the same animal, is also having trouble throwing off the infection), and the second time the vet took pity on us and didn't charge us. Not even for the anesthesia.
So, all told, we've spent over $1,000 on our just-a-cat, and she's nowhere near recovered. At one point my wife mentioned, "in theory, I guess I could just not go pick her up. But that seems wrong." And I agree. I still don't value Daisy's life as highly as I would a person's – but I can't see myself NOT paying for her treatment, either. And I wonder if there will come a point when I CAN say, "That's it, we just can't afford to deal with this any more," or whether, like all the pet fanatics I used to mock, I'm committed for the long haul.

